CryoBuilt Everest Whole-Body Cryotherapy Chamber
Premium electric whole-body cryo - no liquid nitrogen, lower operating cost.
The home cryo system that doesn't require liquid nitrogen - CryoBuilt Everest uses electric refrigeration, which changes the install + operating economics dramatically.
Price: $105,000–$135,000 · Verified: 2026-07-22 · Editor score: 8.7/10 (how we rank)
The home cryo system that doesn't require liquid nitrogen - CryoBuilt Everest uses electric refrigeration, which changes the install + operating economics dramatically.
Most cryotherapy chambers operate at -200°F using liquid nitrogen, which means recurring nitrogen tank deliveries ($300-600/month at home), an evaporator install, and the safety overhead of cryogenic gas. CryoBuilt eliminated that with electric refrigeration - the Everest reaches -110°F using a multi-stage compressor system, no nitrogen, just standard 240V electrical.
The trade vs nitrogen-based systems: lower temperature floor (-110°F vs -200°F), but the published cryotherapy research is conducted at -110 to -160°F, so the dose is in the documented range. Operating cost drops from $300-600/month (nitrogen) to ~$5-10/session (electricity). Maintenance is comparable to a high-end chest freezer.
For home buyers, the Everest is genuinely the practical pick - the nitrogen-based competitors require infrastructure most homes can't easily accommodate. CryoBuilt (founded 2015) launched the Everest in 2020, so it has roughly six years in market, and the manufacturer cites hundreds of installations to date, predominantly commercial rather than private-residence.
Home buyers wanting daily cryo without the nitrogen logistics. Family offices building dedicated wellness rooms. Athletes who want session-on-demand without commute to a cryo studio.
You need below -110°F floor (rare for non-clinical use), or you can't accommodate the 240V install + 8×6 ft footprint.
Pros
- Electric multi-stage refrigeration reaches -110F with no liquid nitrogen, which eliminates the $300 to $600 per month tank deliveries, the evaporator install, and the asphyxiation-risk overhead that define nitrogen cryosaunas.
- Operating cost drops to roughly $5 to $10 per session in electricity, and maintenance is comparable to a high-end commercial chest freezer (annual coil cleaning, occasional refrigerant top-off, door seals every 3 to 5 years).
- The -110F floor sits inside the documented cryotherapy research window (-110 to -160F), so buyers give up temperature headroom versus -200F nitrogen units without falling out of the studied dose range.
- Credible, in-market US manufacturer: CryoBuilt was founded in 2015 and launched the Everest in 2020, giving it roughly six years of field history and a manufacturer-cited install base in the hundreds, predominantly commercial.
- A straightforward 240V install with an 8 by 6 foot footprint and no evaporator or cryogenic plumbing. It historically listed at $105,000 (Essential) to $135,000 (Elite); CryoBuilt has since moved the Everest to direct-by-quote sales (the product page reads Sold Out / Request Equipment Information), so confirm current pricing before buying.
Cons
- The -110F floor is warmer than the -200F that nitrogen commercial cryosaunas hit, so buyers who specifically want the coldest possible exposure will not get it here.
- Whole-body cryotherapy as a category rests on a modest independent evidence base for longevity outcomes, so this is a comfort, recovery, and routine purchase, not a proven clinical intervention.
- Six-figure entry, a dedicated 240V circuit, and a wellness-room footprint put it out of reach for anyone without the space and budget for a permanent install, and the manufacturer's install base skews commercial rather than private-residence.
Specifications
Most often compared with
Featured in these curated stacks
We’ve included this product in 1 editorial bundle - groupings of 4-7 items that work as a system.
Where this fits
CryoBuilt Everest cross-shops across several editorial surfaces on this site: the full brand catalog.
CryoBuilt Everest - buyer FAQ
CryoBuilt Everest vs Impact Cryotherapy - which one?
Not really a head-to-head anymore. The CryoBuilt Everest is a current electric (no-nitrogen) whole-body cryo chamber that hits -110F and runs $50-60K. Impact Cryotherapy made liquid-nitrogen commercial cryosaunas, ceased operations around 2022, and its line is now serviced by Cryo-XS - so it is not a current buyable product. If you want a new whole-body cold setup, the Everest (or another electric no-nitrogen chamber) is the relevant choice; Impact is only relevant if you already own a unit.
Why pick electric cryo over the nitrogen-based commercial systems?
Three reasons. (1) Operating cost: ~$5-10/session electricity vs $300-600/month in nitrogen tank deliveries. (2) Install simplicity: 240V outlet vs nitrogen evaporator + outdoor tank + safety review. (3) Safety: no cryogenic gas asphyxiation risk. The trade is a higher temperature floor (-110F vs -200F), but mHBOT-equivalent: the documented research dose is in the -110 to -160F range, so the protocol is intact.
How much maintenance does the Everest need?
Comparable to a high-end commercial chest freezer. Annual coil cleaning, occasional refrigerant top-off, replace door seals every 3-5 years. CryoBuilt sends a tech for the first annual service ($600-1200), most owners self-maintain after that. No nitrogen logistics means no recurring delivery fees and no tank rental.